Family histories get passed down through generations. This can be important when someone dies owning property and without a will. These family histories can dictate who ends up owning the property.
So what if there are conflicts in the renditions of the histories? And what if there is other evidence? These can be tricky questions. The probate courts and district courts in Texas deal with cases like this quite frequently.
This brings us to the example of the Johnson v. Evans, No. 12-12-00312-CV, 2014 WL 4635842 (Tex. App.—Tyler Sept. 18, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.), case. It involves a dispute about whether oral family history could overcome recorded affidavit of heirship when establishing heirship rights in inherited property.
Facts & Procedural History
William and Harriet once owned a 45.59 acre tract in Anderson County. When they died, the property passed to their heirs through intestate succession. Decades later, their descendants disagreed about who actually inherited what.
Frederick and Christine owned most of the tract. Gerald claimed he owned a portion through deeds from four family members. He sued Frederick and Christine seeking to partition the property and gain access to the land.
The entire dispute turned on a single question: How many children did William and Harriet have? Gerald said they had nine children. If true, Gerald’s deeds from certain relatives would give him an ownership interest. Frederick and Christine said the couple had only eight children. If true, Gerald’s grantors weren’t actually heirs and his deeds conveyed nothing.
Gerald offered a family flow chart that he, his mother, and his aunt had created together. The chart showed nine children including one named Elfford. Gerald testified that Elfford had a son named William Elfford Jasper, also known as Eldredge Jasper. According to Gerald, there were two different men named Eldredge—one was William and Harriet’s son, and the other was their grandson.
Frederick and Christine produced a 1956 affidavit of heirship from A.W. Whitehead, a longtime neighbor. Whitehead swore that William and Harriet had eight children including a son named Eldredge. He stated that his family and the Jasper family had been neighbors for seventy-five years. They attended school and church together. Whitehead was personally acquainted with all eight children.
The trial court sided with Frederick and Christine. The court found that Gerald’s grantors were not heirs of Eldredge. Therefore, Gerald owned no interest in the property and could not obtain partition or injunctive relief. Gerald appealed, which resulted in this court opinion.
Understanding Partition Rights Under Texas Law
Texas law gives joint owners of real property the right to compel partition of their interests. The idea is that the law should not force a joint owner to maintain joint ownership against his will. Joint owners of real property can seek a court order dividing the property among them.
Partition comes in two forms. Partition in kind divides the property into separate parcels. Each parcel is allotted to a separate owner. Partition by sale involves selling the property. The sale proceeds are then divided among the owners.
Texas law favors partition in kind over partition by sale. Courts inquire whether partition in kind would be so impractical or unfair that partition by sale would best serve the parties’ interests. The goal is to preserve the maximum value of the property. Because the law favors partition in kind, the party requesting a partition by sale bears the burden to demonstrate that partition in kind is impractical or unfair.
The party seeking partition bears the burden of proof on the threshold question of ownership. That party must demonstrate that he is a joint owner of the real property to be partitioned. He must show he has an equal right to possession with the other joint owners. Without proof of ownership, a party cannot obtain partition.
Similarly, a party seeking to enjoin another from denying him access to real property must prove his right in the property. This requires evidence of title or some other interest to be protected. A mere claim of ownership without supporting proof is insufficient to obtain injunctive relief.
How Intestate Succession Determines Heirship in Texas
When property passes by intestate succession through family relationships, the courts have to determine who qualifies as an heir. Texas intestacy laws provide the order of inheritance when someone dies without a will. These statutes create a hierarchy of relatives who inherit based on their relationship to the decedent. This is the default estate plan when someone dies without a will.
Under the intestacy laws, if a person dies without a surviving spouse or children, the property passes to the person’s parents. If the parents are deceased, the property passes to the decedent’s siblings and their descendants. These relatives are known as collateral heirs. They include brothers, sisters, nieces, and nephews. Collateral heirs inherit only when closer relatives do not survive the decedent.
Consider a common scenario. A man dies unmarried with no children. His parents predeceased him. Under Texas law, his property passes equally to his siblings. If a sibling also predeceased him, that sibling’s share passes to that sibling’s children through right of representation. The property continues moving through family lines according to the statutory hierarchy.
Proving heirship requires demonstrating the family relationships that create inheritance rights. This might involve showing birth records or marriage certificates. Death certificates establish when someone died and may identify surviving family members. These official documents provide the foundation for proving heirship claims.
What Makes an Affidavit of Heirship Reliable Evidence?
Affidavits of heirship serve as another form of proof in establishing family relationships. These sworn statements typically come from individuals with personal knowledge of the family relationships. Texas law has long recognized affidavits of heirship as evidence of family relationships and inheritance rights.
A properly executed affidavit of heirship recites specific facts about the decedent’s family structure. The affiant identifies surviving heirs by name. The document describes the affiant’s relationship to the family. The affidavit explains the basis for the affiant’s knowledge of these facts.
The most reliable affidavits come from individuals with longstanding personal knowledge of the family. A neighbor who attended school with the family’s children possesses direct knowledge. A family friend who attended church with the family for decades can speak to family composition. These affiants base their statements on years of personal observation rather than secondhand information.
When properly executed and recorded, affidavits of heirship carry substantial weight. The recording creates a public record that predates any later disputes. An affidavit recorded fifty years before probate litigation begins carries more credibility than documents prepared specifically for the lawsuit. The passage of time demonstrates that the affiant had no motive to shade the truth in favor of one side or another.
How Trial Courts Evaluate Conflicting Evidence About Family Relationships
Trial courts function as fact finders in bench trials. They assess witness credibility. They determine the weight to give each piece of evidence. When parties present conflicting testimony or documents, the trial court must resolve these disputes.
The trial court can accept or reject any part or all of a witness’s testimony. The court may believe one witness and disbelieve others. The judge resolves inconsistencies in testimony. The court chooses between competing versions of events. This fact-finding role gives trial courts substantial discretion in determining what evidence to credit.
Several factors influence these credibility determinations. Does the witness have firsthand knowledge or is the testimony based on hearsay? Does the witness have a financial stake in the outcome? Did the witness create documents long before the dispute arose or specifically for the litigation? Has the witness been consistent in the testimony or have the statements changed over time?
The trial court also weighs the inherent reliability of documentary evidence. Official records such as birth certificates or death certificates receive greater weight than personal notes. Recorded documents that have been on file for decades carry more weight than recently created materials. Documents prepared by disinterested third parties are more reliable than those created by parties with a stake in the outcome.
In this case, the trial court had to choose between competing information. On one side sat a recently created family flow chart. Three interested family members prepared it specifically for this litigation. They offered no corroborating documentation. Their testimony reflected family stories rather than personal observation of the earlier generation.
On the other side stood a decades-old recorded affidavit. A neighbor with longstanding personal knowledge created it in 1956. He had no stake in future disputes about the property. His affidavit predated the current litigation by more than fifty years. Nothing suggested Whitehead had any motive to misrepresent the family structure.
The trial court resolved this conflict in favor of the affidavit of heirship. The court found that the grantors in the deeds to Gerald were not heirs of Eldredge Jasper. This finding necessarily rejected Gerald’s theory about nine children including Elfford. The court concluded that Gerald failed to prove his ownership interest in the tract.
The Takeaway
This case teaches a fundamental lesson about proving heirship in Texas partition suits. Family stories and homemade genealogy charts might not always overcome reliable documentary evidence. A decades-old affidavit of heirship from someone with personal knowledge of the family can carry more weight than a recently created flow chart prepared by interested parties for purposes of litigation. Trial courts function as fact finders who assess credibility and resolve conflicts in the evidence based on the reliability and nature of the competing proof and, as in this case, may give more weight to historical affidavits like this than life testimony.
Do you need help with a probate matter in Austin or the surrounding area? We are Austin probate attorneys. We help clients navigate the probate process. Call today for a free confidential consultation, 512-273-7444.
Our Austin Probate Attorneys provide a full range of probate services to our clients, including helping with probate disputes. Affordable rates, fixed fees, and payment plans are available. We provide step-by-step instructions, guidance, checklists, and more for completing the probate process. We have years of combined experience we can use to support and guide you with probate and estate matters. Call us today for a FREE attorney consultation.
Disclaimer
The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. The information presented may not apply to your situation and should not be acted upon without consulting a qualified probate attorney. We encourage you to seek the advice of a competent attorney with any legal questions you may have.
